July 2008

Human Iterations 2008-07-30 10:41:00

(You Cannot Buy Creativity. You Cannot Make Creativity. You Can Only Be Creative.)

Ironically, one of the things I love about transhumanism is its limitations. Transhumanism can never be a political movement, it can only ever be a matter of personal action. How do you stage a protest to call for more invention and ingenuity? You can't. As the statist transhumanists are learning, you can't even pass a law to make it happen. The only option you've got is to roll up your sleeves and get to work.

Sure a lot of people talk about the accelerating pace of technological development. But that no more makes them transhumanists than talking about ninjas makes you a ninja. To be a transhumanist you have to do something to further the transhumanist ideal. "Converting" people behind some banner doesn't really count because numbers are irrelevant. You can't vote the Singularity in.

You can only do your part.

On a somewhat tetchy note of self-defense, Michael Anissimov at Accelerating Future has posted a list of transhumanists in high ranking academic and corporate positions. The implication is that they're actually applying themselves to open new possibilities for human growth. And that's all very fine and well. Some of those names are quite impressive. But I'm interested in the people that aren't professors or CEOs. Because frankly, those are the people least likely to have the eureka moments that count. The real transhumanists are the wide-eyed girls in the observatory and the stubborn boys splicing genes in the basement. I want to see a list of the hackers whose direct action is keeping the Internet open. Or the backyard engineers in the third world who are inventing monumental improvements to our infrastructure with scrapped bicycle parts. Those are the people bootstrapping us to the future. Not some blowhard in front of a podium or pedantic lab tech cranking through instructions.

wombatron’s LOLcatz #2

My personal favorite of all:

Tagged with: ,

Transhuman Flourishing, Pt. 1

This is the introduction to an essay attempting to synthesize virtue ethics in the tradition of Aristotle, Henry Veatch, and Ayn Rand, with the ideas of libertarian transhumanism. I will attempt to give transhumanism an ethical basis, and demonstrate that self-enhancement can be constitutive of human flourishing. I will start by broadly outlining the history and ideas of each tradition.

Virtue ethics is the idea that emphasizes the character of a moral agent, rather than rules or consequences of an action. It has reached its greatest expression in the ideas of Aristotle, Henry Veatch, and Ayn Rand, with such thinkers as Socrates, Thomas Aquinas, Douglas Rasmussen, Douglas Den Uyl, Roderick Long, and Geoffery Plauche also providing key insights. One of the central concepts is "eudaimonia" or human flourishing, the natural end that all human action is aimed towards. Through the use of practical and theoretical wisdom, virtue, and the possession of certain goods, one can consciously aim and reach one's full potential as a human being.

Transhumanism is the idea that technology can and should be used to enhance human mental and physical capabilities. This includes such things as amplified intelligence, "cyborgization" (the inclusion of artificial parts into the human body), and direct neural interfaces (the direct linking of computers to the brain). Libertarian transhumanism is distinguished from other groups, such as democratic and technocratic transhumanism, in that it emphasizes the fact that each individual has the right to enhance themselves as they see fit, and that interfering with the right to self-enhancement is fundamentally immoral and impractical.

The remainder of the essay will be aimed towards a synthesis of self-actualization with self-enhancement, and will be completed (probably in sections) when I find the time.

Vulgar Syndicalism

Kevin Carson has recognized a trend in anarcho-capitalism that he calls "vulgar libertarianism"; libertarians that merely defend today's society minus the state, missing entirely other forms of oppression, including state-sponsered corporations, sexism, racism, etc. I agree entirely, as far as it goes, but I have also recognized a similar trend in social anarchism, what I am going to call "vulgar syndicalism".

Vulgar syndicalists, such as Noam Chomsky, call themselves anarchists while supporting the use of state coercion to break up "private concentrations of power". This actually seems to be a pretty prevalent view, in my limited experience, in the revolutionary left. Carson and others are working to fight against this, but it remains, in my eyes, the biggest obstacle between market anarchists and the radical left.

P2P Foundation Fundraiser

Michel Bauwens, founder of the P2P Foundation, is trying to raise funds to expand the Foundation’s activities. The quality of writing on the P2P Foundation blog is incomparable, and I have relied heavily on material in the P2P Wiki on peer production,…

Continue reading at Mutualist Blog: Free Market Anti-Capitalism …

Total Liberty Online

It was a great loss several years ago when the server went down and all the online issues of Jonathan Simcock's Total Liberty magazine were lost. But now the entire archive is available online. Issues 4-20 are available in pdf format. Issues 1-3 are no longer available in the original format, but are archived in html at Spunk Press (they're linked from the TL website). Check it out.

Talking to a Brick Wall on Wall-E

I’ve already commented (in an addendum to a post at The Art of the Possible) on what I regard as an abysmally by-the-numbers review of Wall-E at Mises Blog. My comment dealt with it only insofar as it recycled the old–and historically illiterate–vul…

Continue reading at Mutualist Blog: Free Market Anti-Capitalism …

Revised Chapter Fourteen Draft–Decentralized Production Technology

Org theory project

Here's what I've been promising a lot of people for a long time: a new version of
Chapter Fourteen: Decentralized Production Technology.
Introduction: Basic Goals and Values
A. Multiple Purpose Production Technology
B. The Transition to Decentralized Manufacturing
C. Desktop Manufacturing Technology
D. Polytechnic
E. Eotechnic, Paleotechnic, and Neotechnic
F. Decentralized Agriculture
G. A Soft Development Path


It's been something over a year since I put the last version of this chapter online, making it by far the most out of date of all my online chapter drafts. This version is about 50% longer than the old one, and the new material includes--among other things--a nice little section on desktop manufacturing technology.

Laws Of The Jungle


“Laws of the Jungle”

by Allen Thornton

Anarchy will, of course, come, if not today, then tomorrow; if not tomorrow, then ten thousand years from now. The history of the world is the steady increase of wealth. The land and resources ultimately wind up in the hands of those who can produce the most wealth from them. It follows, logically, that the wealth destroying state will eventually fade into history. But for now, the government is a new toy that the people cannot stop playing with. It seems to them so simple, so easy, so logical to solve their problems with extorted money and threats of violence concealed behind the holiness of the state. But even now, in the last two hundred years, we see the beginnings of the attack on government itself. One day, the very idea of government will seem like an insane artifact of the past: witch burning, crusading, black slavery, prohibition. Then the people will look back and wonder at the nature of man. Like Macbeth they will say, “Can such things be, and overcome us like a summer’s cloud, without our special wonder?”

[Download PDF]

[mirror]

Proudhon Seminar

Shawn Wilbur, one of the Internet's leading scholars in the history of anarchism (and especially of the petty bourgeois socialist varieties like individualist and mutualist anarchism) is conducting a seminar on Proudhon's What Is Property? He describes it as sort of a trial run for the Mutual School project. In-depth work begins Wednesday, July 2, with

...Chapter 5, Part II, Section 3. I intend to deal with that final section in two posts, taking them in reverse order:

1) Proudhon's ten point program
2) The nature of "liberty"

I'll follow that with some discussion of Chapter One, Proudhon's discussion of method, probably on Thursday.

You can sign up for the seminar's mailing list at the site.